Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update sawp dependencies to 0.13.1 due to SPDX license compatibility. #12328

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bmbenson
Copy link

Bump the version of sawp used to one that is corrected upstream to be compatible with SPDX license scanners.

Make sure these boxes are checked accordingly before submitting your Pull Request -- thank you.

Contribution style:

Our Contribution agreements:

Changes (if applicable):

  • [N/A] I have updated the User Guide (in doc/userguide/) to reflect the changes made
  • [N/A] I have updated the JSON schema (in etc/schema.json) to reflect all logging changes
    (including schema descriptions)

Describe changes:

Bump the version of sawp used to one that is corrected upstream to be compatible with SPDX license scanners.
@bmbenson bmbenson requested a review from jasonish as a code owner December 30, 2024 23:44
Copy link
Member

@victorjulien victorjulien left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for looking into this. We need a couple of changes:

  1. we need to also update Cargo.lock.in
  2. since master also uses the older sawp, we need to address it there first, and then consider a backport

In general, we are conservative in main-7.0.x with updating anything other than a patch version, so we'll also have to review what risks we'd introduce by bumping the minor version here.

@bmbenson
Copy link
Author

bmbenson commented Jan 8, 2025

Sounds good - will be making the changes shortly!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants